Legal Opinion

United States v. Arcade Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1953No. 11584_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this case is whether certain business transactions amounted to a corporate reorganization under Section 112(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 U.S. C.A. § 112(g). The district court held that there was no reorganization, and the government appealed.

The facts are as follows: The Arcade Company, organized in 1902, long prior to the enactment of the Federal Income Tax Amendment, employed, in 1943, a tax accountant and attorneys to work out a plan to minimize federal taxes and provide for a larger share of the company’s earnings for its stockholders.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Mascot Stove Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Braicks v. HenricksenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1942
  5. Henricksen v. BraicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. William Liddon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Maria Prothro Liddon v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  2. Gravois Planing Mill Company, Charles A. And Florence Beckemeier v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Bard-Parker Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Lanrao, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API