Legal Opinion

Spring v. City of Cambridge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 18, 1912Published

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The plaintiffs’ intestate was the purchaser at a tax sale of certain property sold by the collector of taxes of the defendant city for non-payment of taxes. It subsequently appeared that by reason of error in the sale the intestate had no claim upon the property sold. This is an action to recover under R. L. c. 13, § 44, the amount with interest paid by the plaintiffs’ intestate for said property. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the presiding judge* found for the plaintiffs. The case is here on exceptions by the defendant in regard to rulings that were made and refused by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Harriman v. TyndaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Spring v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API