Legal Opinion
State v. Willis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 8, 1983No. C9-82-1054Published
1Opinion of the Court
332 N.W.2d 180 (1983)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Wayne William WILLIS, Appellant, and
Alexina M. Endrizzi, Appellant.
No. C9-82-1054.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 8, 1983.
Patterson-Restovich Law Office, George F. Restovick and Kevin A. Lund, Rochester, for Willis.
Dingle, Suk, Wendland & Walters and Terrence M. Walters, Rochester, for Endrizzi.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, DeWayne P. Mattson, County Atty., Rochester, Frederick S. Suhler, Jr., Rochester City Atty., Rochester, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
SCOTT, Justice.
This appeal…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Amdahl; Concurrence · Simonett.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.