Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 19, 1973No. 55599PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Defendant appeals from judgment on his guilty plea conviction for the crime of lascivious acts with a child in violation of Code section 725.2. We affirm.

Defendant asserts the trial court failed to sufficiently comply with the guideline established by State v. Sisco, Iowa, 169 N.W.2d 542. He argues the record does not establish waiver of his right to a jury trial and to confront his accusers. Also that the court failed to determine there was a factual basis for the plea and the court should have again followed the Sisco guideline at the time of sentencing.

After a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SiscoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. State v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. State v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. State v. MehuysSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. State v. ReavesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. State v. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. State v. RandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API