Hoyt v. Hoyt
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Greene District Cowrt. Plaintiff brought this action to recover a sum of money which she alleges defendant received on an order which she delivered to him. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEeed, J.
The undisputed facts are that prior to the seventh day of February, 1881, defendant and Stephen Hoyt (who is plaintiff’s husband) were engaged in business as partners. On that date the partnership was dissolved, and the partners made a contract of settlement. By this contract, defendant agreed to pay the debts of the firm, and Stephen Hoyt agreed to pay to defendant certain amounts which he had received from the firm during the existence of the partnership. On the twenty-eighth of February, Stephen Hoyt delivered to defendant an order drawn by himself on Brooks & Baumhover, for $100, on which…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Overhouser v. American Cereal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Ross v. Hawkeye InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Pratt v. Fishwild & WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Marengo Savings Bank v. KentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.