Legal Opinion

Brant v. Krilich

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 2005No. 45A03-0411-CV-514PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant William J. Brant, Jr. appeals from the trial court's decision that Appel-lee Robert Krilich is entitled to a pro rata portion of certain bank accounts with which Brant is affiliated and to Brant's ownership interest in several limited Hability companies ("LLCs"). 1 He presents numerous issues for our review, which we restate as two dispositive issues: (1) whether the various Garnishee Businesses 2 should have received notice of the garnishment proceeding involving the checking accounts in their respective names, and (2) whether the Business Entities 3 should…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Aronson v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mann v. Russell's Trailer Repair, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Lambert v. Farmers Bank, Frankfort, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Troutwine Estates Development Co. v. ComSub Design & Engineering, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Zokaites v. Pittsburgh Irish Pubs, LLC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Ruben Pazmino v. Bose McKinney & Evans, LLPIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Boone County Utilities, LLC v. Branham Corp. (In re Boone County Utilities, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Andrew Nemeth Properties, LLC v. William A PanzicaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API