In Re Comdisco Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Counsel for the plaintiff class in this securities fraud action (“Class Counsel”) seek an order compelling the production by the Individual Defendants (a collective term employed here to designate the defendants other than Comdisco, Inc. (“Comdisco”)) 1 of any directors’ and officers’ insurance policies and any other insurance policies relevant to the litigation (collectively “Insurance Policies”). Under ordinary circumstances such production is compelled by the express initial disclosure provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 26(a)(1)(B).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hockey v. MedhekarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cornielsen v. Infinium Capital Mgmt., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- In re Royal Ahold N.V. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Kurt Cornielsen v. Infinium Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Kurt Cornielsen v. Infinium Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.