Legal Opinion

Amerkhail v. Blinken

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 7, 2022No. 4:22-cv-00149Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION WAHIDULLAH AMERKHAIL, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:22-cv-00149-SRC ) ANTONY BLINKEN, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) Memorandum and Order Looking forward to beginning their life together, Wahidullah Amerkhail petitioned the government for a visa that would allow his fiancée to journey to the United States. After years of alleged delay, Amerkhail now sues for a court order compelling the government to finish adjudicating the application. Defendants move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, raising…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Samvel Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. V S Limited Partnership, an Arkansas Limited Partnership v. Department of Housing and Urban Development United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Sanchez-GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API