Penny v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOON, J.
— George Edward Penny was convicted in Prince William County Circuit Court for making obscene phone calls in violation of Code § 18.2-427. The primary evidence introduced against Penny consisted of computer-generated “call trap” records which designated the residence in which Penny lived as the originating source of the obscene phone calls. Penny appeals and alleges that the computer printouts should not have been admitted into evidence because they were not proven sufficiently reliable. We agree and reverse his conviction.
On March 24, 1986, Ms. Nina C. Hamilton reported to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Perma Research & Development v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Saunders v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
- State v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MeeksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Hanson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.