Legal Opinion
Marangian v. Apelian
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These are two actions of tort against the same defendant, a physician, to recover direct and consequential damages for the same alleged malpractice.
The declaration in the case of the infant plaintiff, Azad, alleged, in substance, that for the period of about eight weeks beginning on or about January 15, 1928, the defendant, a physician hired and employed to treat the plaintiff, carelessly, negligently and unskilfully treated, handled and attended the plaintiff whereby the plaintiff was injured. The answer was a general denial. On motion of the defendant that the plaintiff be required to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Green v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Semerjian v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Hollidge v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Toy v. MackintoshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Traverse v. WingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Haggerty v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Campbell v. ThorntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Liggett Drug Co. v. License CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Vigneault v. Dr. Hewson Dental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Bouffard v. CanbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.