Weidebusch v. Hartenstein
West Virginia Supreme Court
Appeal from and supersedeas to a decree of the circuit court of Ohio county, rendered on the 15th day of No-' vember, 1873, in a cause in chancery, in which August Weidebusch was the plaintiff, and Herman Hartenstein and others were defendants, granted on the petition of the said Weidebusch. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court:
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, Judge
This case is presented to us by August Weidebusch, upon an appeal from, and supersedeas to a decree rendered by the circuit court of Ohio county, November 15, 1873, which declared the equity of the case with the defendants, and dismissed the plaintiff's bill.
The plaintiff by his bill, which was filed the first Monday of July, 1872, sought to vacate and annul a certain deed made and entered into between said Weide-busch and one Zachariah Jacob, December 24, 1850, upon the ground that said Jacob,- “ through misapprehension and by mistake,” drew up a deed instead of a will, when the plaintiff…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Pusey v. GardnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Jarrell v. JarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
- Seymour v. AlkireWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Knipp v. MyersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Chamberlaine v. Marsh's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1819
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.