Legal Opinion

United States v. Devil's Hole, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-4553, 80-4554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

Following a non-jury trial, the submission of post-trial memoranda, and oral argument, I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a).

Findings of Fact

1. Anthracite silt is the residue matter following the wet washing of freshly mined coal or processed coal at the mine site. This residue matter is slushed into silt dams. (Stipulation ¶ 1) 1

2. Scalp screening involves passing anthracite silt over a screen to remove only large rocks, tree limbs and other large debris…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Galgay v. GangloffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. United States v. Devil's Hole, Inc. United States of America v. Hecla MacHinery and Equipment Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Brook Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Brook Contracting Corp. (d.c. Civil No. 82-1362) United States of America v. Tri-County Land and Coal Company. (d.c. Civil No. 83-0171) Appeal of Brook Contracting Corporation and Tri-County Land and Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API