Town of Ripon v. Joint School District No. Eleven
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Fond du Lac County. A stipulation was filed in this action which sets forth the following facts: Prior to the 17th of August, 1858, Joint School District No. 11, (the defendant) consisted of a part of the town of Eipon, and of the city of Eipon, both in Fond du Lac ■county, and a part of the town of Brooklyn, in Green Lake county.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Fond du Lac County. A stipulation was filed in this action which sets forth the following facts: Prior to the 17th of August, 1858, Joint School District No. 11, (the defendant) consisted of a part of the town of Eipon, and of the city of Eipon, both in Fond du Lac ■county, and a part of the town of Brooklyn, in Green Lake county. On the day last mentioned, the town superintendent of said town of Eipon made an order directed to the clerk of said town, and filed in the office of said clerk, directing that certain parts of sections 5, 6, 7 and 8 in said town…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Cole, J.
As this case does not purport to contain all the evidence given on the trial, it is impossible for us to say that the finding of the court upon- the facts was incorrect. The court says, in the finding, thafithe cause was submitted upon the written stipulation and the facts therein stated, as well as upon the verbal admissions by the parties, of facts before the court, and other evidence. Now the written stipulation is given, but we are not informed what facts were admitted before the court by- the parties. Under such circumstances, it is manifestly impossible for us to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Matteson v. Town of RosendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875