Legal Opinion

Stegner v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1933No. 29,438PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Chief Justice.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission awarding compensation.

George R. Stegner, one of the relator’s employes, on October 12, 1922, met death under circumstances creating liability under the workmen’s compensation act. His dependents were his wife, Sarah Stegner, and Dorothy L. Stegner, a six-year old daughter by a former marriage. Hazel M. Stegner, the divorced wife and mother of said minor, was given the custody of the child and is now her guardian. • An award of compensation was duly made by which the relator was directed to pay to Sarah Stegner,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warner v. ZaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Lunceford v. Fegles Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Radisson Hotel v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Texas Compensation Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Blankenship v. Highlands Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Enghusen v. H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Johnson v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Olson v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API