Beach v. Atkinson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Judgments. Jurisdiction. Justices’ courts. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge Harris. Coweta superior court. March term, 1890. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
Hindsman was a resident of Texas, and was entitled to a legacy in his father’s estate in Georgia. Brunswig had obtained a judgment against Hindsman, and sued out garnishment against the administrator of Hinds-man’s father, in Meriwether county, Georgia. Hinds-*289man seems to have been indebted to one Beach, who also resided in Texas, for borrowed money, eleven or twelve hundred dollars, and to Frank & Divine, a firm, of attorneys in Texas, for counsel fees, $470. Hinds-man gave to Beach and Frank & Divine a bill of sale to his iuterest in his father’s estate in Georgia, and this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Central Bank v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Raney v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Raefle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Georgia Rail Road & Banking Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Suydam v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peeples v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Miller v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- DeLamater v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Ogden Equipment Co. v. Talmadge Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Burgin & Sons Glass Co. v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.