Legal Opinion
Matthew Goose v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2001No. 00-1708PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGUE, District Judge.
Matthew Goose seeks appellate review of the District Court’s 2 order upholding the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration (SSA) denying Goose’s petition for disability benefits. Goose alleges the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) did not have substantial evidence to support his decision, that Goose met the listing of impairments under the Social Security Act (the Act), and that the hypothetical question posed to the vocational expert failed to include all the relevant impairments and limitations. We conclude that the ALJ did not err in his decision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen R. Prosch v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Ralph R. CRUZE, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Billie HINCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Tony Ray SMITH, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Karen OBERST, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nicolls v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
- Berry v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
- Alan W. Simmons v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Clayton M. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026
- Forrest Cole v. Larry MassanariCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.