Legal Opinion

Jones v. Briggs

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 17, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Defendant suffered an adverse verdict and appeals, relying on two exceptions taken to instructions to the jury, and upon allegations under the general motion for a new trial.

At trial term, issue was joined on a declaration in assumpsit, intended to include demand for a broker’s commission in finding a purchaser for real estate of the defendant.

The declaration could be treated as containing two counts for the same item, account annexed, and for money had and received.

To the former objection might then have been raised, because at the drafting of the writ, if the sheet in common use was availed…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Manuel Torres v. ArbonaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  2. Beckmann, Inc. v. (Zinke's) Rainbow's EndNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Gerstian v. TibbettsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
  4. Bartlett v. ChisholmSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. D'Alfonso v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API