Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 18, 2010No. A10A1236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, Senior Appellate Judge.

A jury found Melvin Lee Jackson guilty of sale of cocaine, and the trial court denied his motion for new trial. On appeal, Jackson contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal because the confidential informant involved in the drug deal entrapped him as a matter of law. We disagree and affirm.

The standard of review for the denial of a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal is the same as for determining the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction. We view the evidence in the light most favorable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Thurmond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Julius Raynard Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API