Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2009No. 07-40651Published

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Once more a federal court is called to say that the purpose of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 is to protect competition and, therefore, only those practices that will likely affect competition adversely violate the Act. That is this holding.

This appeal is concerned only with § 202 of the Packers and Stockyards Act (“PSA”) enacted in 19211 to cope with market control of the meat packing industry by five companies. That section as it stands today, codified as 7 U.S.C. § 192, is set forth in the appendix and referred to hereafter as codified. Congress has amended…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API