Legal Opinion

Ryan v. La Rosa

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion to cancel a notice of pendency of action granted.

The plaintiff is an attorney who has allegedly represented the defendants in certain real estate negotiations. In a complaint containing seven causes of action he sues for the reasonable value of Ms services. None of the actions are brought to “ recover a judgment affecting the title to, or the possession, use, or enjoyment of real property ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 120). Therefore, the plaintiff was not entitled to file a notice of pendency of action (Kauffman v. Simis, 156 App. Div. 208). However, as the motion is for relief under section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kauffman v. SimisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Congel v. MalfitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Tropeano v. TropeanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Snitow v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API