Legal Opinion

Duke v. Heppleston

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 22, 1966No. Civ. No. 65-715PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT .

MEHRTENS, District Judge.

I — BACKGROUND

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment to determine the rights of the plaintiffs, Anthony D. Duke and Diane D. Duke (hereinafter referred to as “Dukes”), on a certain promissory note. The defendants, Donald T. Heppleston and Joan M. Heppleston (hereinafter referred to as “Hepplestons”), counterclaimed against Dukes and cross-claimed against Maroda Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Maroda”) for judgment on the note. David Shriber is also named as a defendant but no personal liability…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anthony D. Duke and Diane D. Duke v. Donald T. Heppleston and Joan M. Heppleston, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Falls at Naples, Ltd. v. Barnett Bank of Naples, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API