Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Sappenfield

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1894No. 1,217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Vigo Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

The appellee sued the appellant to recover damages for injuries received by reason of appellant’s negligent failure to erect and maintain suitable barriers and railings upon a certain county bridge.

A former judgment in appellee’s favor was reversed by this court. Board, etc., v. Sappenfield, 6 Ind. App. 577.

A subsequent trial resulted in another verdict and judgment for appellee.

The only questions presented to us arise upon the motion for a new trial.

' We have examined the evidence, and find it to sustain the verdict in all essential respects. There is abundant evidence to justify the jury in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturgeon v. SturgeonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. McDaneld v. McDaneldIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Haines v. PouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Board of Commissioners v. SappenfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Haynes, Spencer & Co. v. ErkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Seymour National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API