Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1974No. 3-573A53PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1

STATEMENT ON THE APPEAL

Staton, J.

Before sentencing upon his rape conviction, Robert Lee Schmidt petitioned the trial court for an examination as a possible criminal sexual deviant. Two psychiatrists were appointed by the trial court to examine him. Prior to the hearing on the petition, Robert Lee Schmidt filed a motion to vacate the conviction. This motion was heard at the same time as the petition over the objection of the State of Indiana. Both psychiatrists testified that Robert Lee Schmidt was not a criminal sexual deviant. In addition to this testimony upon the petition, both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Edward B. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  5. Evans v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Clay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Richardson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Richardson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API