Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Boyd and Sons Press Sales, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1960No. Civ. 5-60-65PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Jurisdiction is established by diversity and the amount sued for. Defendants above named will be referred to herein as Boyd, Punch, and Diversified respectively. Superwood Corporation will be referred to as Superwood.

The matter is presently before the court on motions by Boyd and Punch to quash service of process and to dismiss plaintiff’s action. 1 The motion is opposed by plaintiff and Diversified. Diversified has answered and cross-claimed against Punch.

In summary the file contents disclose plaintiff’s complaint which states a claim against defendants for personal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Atkins v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Fugate v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. William F. Buckley, Jr. v. New York Post CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Tice v. Wilmington Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. St. Clair v. RighterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API