Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Eagle Insurance & Chowdhury
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ralph Yachnin, J.
Ordered that this petition by petitioner Eagle Insurance Company (Company), by notice of petition, dated June 6, 1990, for an order permanently staying uninsured motorist arbitration between the Company and respondent Gansafar Chowdhury (Chowdhury), on the ground that Chowdhury failed to give requisite notice of the accident to the Company by affidavit within 90 days thereof and on the further ground that there was no physical contact between the vehicle driven by Chowdhury and anyone else, is disposed of as follows:
This matter requires a hearing. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Home Indemnity Co. v. MessanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Arbitration between Empire Mutual Insurance & ZelinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Home Assurance Co. v. CeballosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Arbitration between Eveready Insurance & SchwartzbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re the Arbitration between Hartford Fire Insurance & FellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008