Legal Opinion

DiPalma v. Eveready Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant is required to provide the plaintiff with underinsured motorist coverage, or, in the alternative, to proceed to arbitration, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated October 22, 2002, which, in effect, denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, granted the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment, and directed it to provide the plaintiff with underinsured motorist coverage.

*521Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. FalisiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API