Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Perkins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 14, 2013Published

1ConcurrenceGants, J.

(concurring, with whom Spina, J., joins). I agree with the court that the “important purpose” of the probable cause hearing described in G. L. c. 276, § 38 (§ 38), is “to prevent the defendant from being held for trial on a groundless or unmeritorious charge” by providing a judicial determination of probable cause.* 1 Ante at 103, citing Corey v. Commonwealth, 364 Mass. 137, 141 (1973), and Myers v. Commonwealth, 363 Mass. 843, 847 (1973) (Myers). I also agree with the court that, under our existing jurisprudence, this so-called probable cause hearing requires the Commonwealth to prove more…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. St. PierreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Myers v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API