Legal Opinion

Cadle Company v. 1007 Joint Venture

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1996No. 95-50403PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises out of a suit on a promissory note executed by 1007 Joint Venture. The question is whether suit was barred by limitations. The note changed hands several times before The Cadle Company acquired it. Cadle Company then sued Joint Venture to collect a deficiency due on the note. Joint Venture moved for summary judgment, arguing that Cadle Company’s suit was time-barred under Texas law. Cadle Company responded that as an assignee of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, it enjoyed the longer federal statute of limitations applicable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. William C. Davidson v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for United Bank of Texas, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Cadle Co. v. Estate of WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. EKA LIQUIDATORS v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Geiselman v. Cramer Financial Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. UMLIC-Nine Corp. v. Lipan Springs Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Bolduc v. Beal Bank, SSBCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Recursion Software, Inc. v. Interactive Intelligence, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API