In re Orans

Breitel, J. P. (dissenting).

The order granting the motion to intervene and purporting indirectly to hold the State Legis*226lature in terrorem unless it propound a valid reapportionment plan by February 1, 1966 should be reversed and the motion denied. The order constitutes an extraordinary and premature reach of power over the two other co-ordinate branches of government, the Legislative and the Executive, a distortion of a procedural remedy, and an unnecessary impulse toward a constitutional conflict and a potential confrontation of power among co-ordinate elements of State government.

Special…