Legal Opinion

Geary v. Phillips

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John H. Galloway, Jr., J.

Plaintiffs move, in this action for a declaratory judgment and for an injunction, for summary judgment under CPLR 3212 (subd. [b]) on the grounds that there are no triable issues of fact herein and no defenses to their cause of action, and for an injunction pending the determination of the action, pursuant to CPLR 6301.

Defendants cross-move for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint as a matter of law. Defendants have admitted all the allegations of material fact of the amended complaint.

Plaintiffs are the Chief of Police and five senior police officers of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gorman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Humbeutel v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Gorman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Humbeutel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Peters v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kraus v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Palmer v. TiccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Pettit v. McCabeNew York Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API