Legal Opinion

Appeals of Gifford

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 16, 1926No. Docket Nos. 2677 and 2678PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*337OPINION.

Trussell:

The principal question involved in these appeals is whether or not certain improvements and additions to leased premises occupied by the partnership, Younger, Gifford & Cullum, of which the taxpayers were members, and certain machinery, appara*338tus and equipment were partnership assets, all of the items mentioned having been purchased with partnership funds and used exclusively in the partnership business. If these items were partnership assets, they should be included in invested capital for the purpose of computing partnership excess-profits tax for 1917, and the partnership…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deming v. MossUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Fairfield v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. In re Minor & SonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gifford v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API