Legal Opinion

De Marzo v. Gatto

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1953Published

1Opinion of the CourtGolden, J.

Motion by defendant Castorina for an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff brings this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The complaint alleges that plaintiff installed an oil-burning system in certain premises formerly owned by the defendants G-atto, but record title to which is presently in the name of the defendant Castorina. The sale and installation of the heating system were made pursuant to a conditional sales contract which provided, in part, as follows: “It is agreed that, irrespective of the method or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heating & Plumbing Finance Corp. v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API