Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank of Utah v. Madsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1951No. 7584PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

The Commercial Bank of Utah, appellant here and plaintiff below, held a mortgage on the home of the defendants Madsen, to secure the sum of $1,950 out of a total indebtedness of $4,121.19. Foreclosure proceedings were brought; judgment of foreclosure was duly entered, and the property was the subject of a sheriff’s sale. The bank takes this appeal' asserting certain objections to the time and manner of sale by the sheriff, and the amount for which the property was sold.

After the entry of judgment the attorney for the bank delivered to the Sheriff of Sanpete County, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Canton Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Fox v. CurryMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. National Realty Sales Co. v. EwingUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Chausse v. Bank of GarlandUtah Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gaskill v. NealIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  2. City of St. Louis v. PeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Commercial Bank of Utah v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ruth B. Hardy Revocable Trust v. RindlesbachCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API