Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 25, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00800Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHANIEL MORGAN, an individual, No. 2:19-cv-00800-TLN-KJN and on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 ROHR, INC., a corporation; HAMILTON 15 SUNDSTRAND, a corporation, d/b/a UTC AEROSPACE SYSTEMS d/b/a COLLINS 16 AEROSPACE; UNITED TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a corporation; and 17 DOES 1 through 50, inclusively, 18 Defendant. 19 20 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Rohr, Inc., Hamilton Sundstrand, and 21 United Technology Corporation’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API