Legal Opinion

State v. Carrico

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1977No. 3910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

The appellant was charged by indictment with rape, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-611(A) and § 13-614. The trial jury found him guilty of rape in the second degree. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S. Supreme Court Rules, rule 47(e).

The sole issue in this appeal concerns the court’s giving an instruction on second degree rape when the indictment recited a violation of A.R.S. § 13-611(A). In 1962 the legislature amended the rape statute to provide for degrees of rape; first degree, as defined in A.R.S. § 13-611(A), involves what is often referred to as forcible rape; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. VineyardArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. KlemArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. United States v. Clifford Joseph LittlewindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. FaughtArizona Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robert Dale Gray v. Robert RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. State v. MarquezArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. Dwayne Noble BanksIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Robert Dale Gray v. Samuel A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API