Legal Opinion

Warner v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 12, 2009No. A09A1014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Ronaldo Warner appeals his conviction of armed robbery 1 and possession of a gun during the commission of a crime. 2 He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress, in admitting similar transaction evidence, in excluding his proffered evidence of a bank robbery by another, in refusing to give a curative instruction regarding remarks in the State’s closing argument, and in disallowing reputation evidence from a high school football coach. We hold that these enumerations either lack merit or were waived below.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Hamilton v. ShumpertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Payton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Curry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API