Legal Opinion

Crawford v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928No. 26070PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

Faun M. Crawford, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquors within the city of Hastings, in violation of an ordinance of said city. He prosecutes error to review the record of his conviction.

Defendant alleges that there was error in that the complaint does not charge a violation of the ordinance; in the giving of instructions; in the overruling of his motion for a directed verdict; and in rulings on the admission of testimony.

It is argued that the complaint is insufficient because it does not charge that defendant “knowingly”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coxbill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Latham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Texter v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Henry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Luster v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API