Legal Opinion
McDowell v. Davies
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided March 15, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 850PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRIVER, Chief Judge.
A motion to dismiss a writ of garnishment questions the jurisdiction of the court in this case. It was instituted as an original action by the filing of a complaint on October 17, 1949, in which plaintiff seeks *302to recover judgment against the defendants on two promissory notes in the principal amount of $3500. The complaint recites that the plaintiff is a resident of and domiciled in the eastern district of Washington and that the defendants are residents of and domiciled in the state of Idaho. Neither of the defendants has been served with summons and neither of them has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Big Vein Coal Co. of W. Va. v. ReadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Davis v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schaefer v. HessingerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1954
- Hearst v. HearstDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Interstate Cigar Co. v. Corral Wodiska y CADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962