Legal Opinion

Neusberger v. Brodejefsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 15, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appear by the under-tenant from a final order in summary proceedings awarding the delivery of the possession of certain premises to the petitioner, made by one of the justices of the Municipal Court of the city of Rew York, sitting in the borough of Manhattan.

1Per curiam

The appellant is a party to summary proceedings instituted to recover the possession of certain real property situate in the borough of Manhattan, upon the ground that the tenant’s term therein has expired. The petition alleges that the appellant is an under-tenant, and as such continued in possession of the demised premises after the expiration of such term, without ' the permission of the landlord thereof. Hence he' had the right to file an answer and to defend the proceedings. Code Civ. Pro., § 2244; People ex rel. Jacks v. Callahan, 8 Week. Dig. 298. The appellant filed an answer denying…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rochdale Village, Inc. v. GoodeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  2. Teachers College v. WolterdingCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. Cohen v. 515 Broadway Realty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API