Legal Opinion

Mercantile Exchange Leasing Corp. v. Astor-Broadway Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The deposit, which is the subject of the second cause of action of the complaint, falls within the category of money “ deposited or advanced on a contract for the use or rental of real property as security for performance of the contract” and defendant was obliged, upon receipt of the deposit to hold it in accordance with the mandate of section 233 of the Real Property Law. The commingling of the money deposited with its own funds was a conversion entitling plaintiff to recover the amount of the deposit. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the second cause of action should have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mercantile Exchange Leasing Corp. v. Astor-Broadway Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API