Legal Opinion · Dissent

Youngblood v. Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 25, 1929No. 12737Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(concurring and dissenting) : I concur in the disposition made by Mr. Justice Stabler of exceptions 2, 3, 4 and 5, and agree that, under his conclusion which directs a hew trial, it was not necessary to consider exception 6, which charges error in refusing the motion before the Circuit Judge for a new trial.

I do not concur in his disposition of exception 1, which assigns error in refusing the motion of the defendants for a directed verdict in their favor. On the contrary, I am convinced that the motion should have been granted, and the result announced now, which is inevitable after possibly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API