Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Saul

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-3829Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HAROLD GEORGE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. 19-cv-3829-RCL ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Harold George Johnson brings this action challenging a Social Security Administration determination that he is ineligible for disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income because he is not disabled under the Social Security Act, 42 USC. § 401 et seq. Before the Court are plaintiffs Motion for Judgment of Reversal, ECF No. 17, and defendant Andrew M. Saul’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance, ECF No. 18.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. McIntyre v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Tara Crump v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Gail Martin v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API