Legal Opinion

D.S. Magazines, Inc. v. Warner Publisher Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 19, 1985No. 85 Civ. 1877 (EW)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff D.S. Magazines moves to compel a nonparty witness to answer questions posed during a deposition, to impose sanctions on defendant Warner Publisher Services (“Warner”) and its counsel, and for an order disqualifying Weil Gotshal & Manges from representing Warner.

On November 25 and 27, 1985, D.S. took the oral deposition of Mary McGrath, a former employee of Warner who was the account executive handling D.S.’s account with Warner. During the deposition, McGrath testified that she had retained defendant’s counsel to help her prepare for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. The City of Long Beach, as Trustee for the State of California State of California, on Behalf of Itself and All Political Subdivisions and Special Districts Within the State Similarly Situated State of Florida, Ex Rel. Jim Smith, Attorney General State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents and State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Company of California Amerada Hess Corporation Cities Services Company and Cities Service Oil Company Conoco, Inc. Getty Oil Company Gulf Oil Corporation Powerline Oil Company Standard Oil Company of Indiana and Ohio Sun Oil Company, Inc. Atlantic Richfield Company Mobil Oil Corporation Phillips Petroleum Company Exxon Corporation Shell Oil Company Texaco, Inc. And Union Oil Company of California, and Leroy K. Cheney Charles F. Temme Milford E. Tracy Clinton E. Kelley L. John Gandsey and Ralf Eckles, Third Party Deponents-Appellants. Mobil Oil Corporation Exxon Corporation Leroy K. Cheney Ralf Eckles L. John Gandsey Clinton E. Kelley Charles F. Temme Milford E. Tracy Union Oil Company of California Howard K. Said and Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison v. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, State of California, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Occidental Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guillen v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API