Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 15, 1951No. 289PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402; United States v. United States Smelting Co., 339 U. S. 186.

Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of. this case.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Delaune v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Dock Perry Glenn v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  3. Whipp v. Bayou Plaquemine Brule Drainage Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. True Oil Company v. GibsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Detlic Farm & Timber Co. v. Board of Com'rsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API