Legal Opinion

Lee v. Puleston

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 1, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C.J.

— The writ of error is to a judgment for the defendants on demurrer being sustained to an amended declaration.

The suit was against S. Puleston and Edward Higgins on a note dated Asheville, N. C., October 16th, 1926, for the sum of $1500.00 payable two months after date and executed by George W. Knight, S. Puleston and Edward Higgins. The suit was filed in the Circuit Court of Seminole County, Florida, and the amended declaration was in four counts. The first count was as follows:

“The said S. Puleston and Edward Higgins, together with one George W. Knight, on to-wit: the 16th day of October,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Orlando v. GoodingSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. PiccoloSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. International Shoe Co. v. HewittSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Phillippi Creek Homes, Inc. v. ArnoldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Corlett, as v. OliverSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Corlett, as v. OliverSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API