Harding v. Cianbro Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Because Mr. Harding has been uncompensated during the hiatus between the date of the jury verdict and the date he returned to work at Cianbro Corporation (Cianbro), the Court orders an additional lost wage award pro-rated to fill this gap.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS 1
On August 22, 2006, a jury returned a verdict against Cianbro finding that Cianb-ro terminated Mr. Harding on September 9, 2002 because of his disability. The jury award included $563,000 in back pay damages. Jury Verdict (Docket # 149). On September 7, 2006, Mr.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Palmer v. Champion MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Scarfo v. Cabletron Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Mary Jane Kerr SELGAS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and Whadzen Carrasquillo, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peters v. Rivers Edge Mining, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Vera v. Alstom Power, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016