Legal Opinion

Goins v. Teamsters Local 639—Employers Health & Pension Trust

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 27, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-2811Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on the question of whether the defendants, the Teamsters Local 639 — Employers Health and Pension Trust (“Trust”) and its Trustees, violated their fiduciary duty to Huston Goins, a now-deceased beneficiary of the disability Pension Plan (“Plan”) administered by the Trust.1 The plaintiff is Lyda Belle Goins, the surviving spouse of Huston Goins, and the executor of his estate. She charges that the defendants acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Thomas Lavella v. W. A. BoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Arthur E. Short v. United Mine Workers of America 1950 Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Alfred Stacey v. Harrison CombsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. Robinson v. United Mine Workers Of America Health And Retirement FundsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API