Commonwealth v. Mwangi
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
In 2013 the defendant admitted to sufficient facts to support charges of possession of a class B substance and conspiracy to violate drug laws. The case was continued without a finding (CWOF) for six months. Several years later, the defendant moved for a new trial,2 arguing that plea counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to advise him of the immigration consequences of the pleas.3 After a nonevidentiary hearing, the same judge who accepted the pleas denied the motion. The defendant now appeals. We reverse.4
We review a judge's decision on a motion for new trial "to determine…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Jae Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.