Southern California Edison Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1. In connection with the construction of Boulder Dam petitioner in 1930 contracted to purchase certain minimum specified amounts of electric power to be generated for a period of about 50 years.
Read the full summary
1. In connection with the construction of Boulder Dam petitioner in 1930 contracted to purchase certain minimum specified amounts of electric power to be generated for a period of about 50 years. As the facts developed it was not required to begin taking such power pursuant to its commitment prior to June 1, 1940. The dam was completed and some generating facilities actually began to produce electric energy in 1936. In late 1936 and early 1937, three cities, Los Angeles, Burbank, and Glendale, which had previously purchased their power at wholesale from petitioner for resale through their…
1Opinion of the Court
Southern California Edison Company Ltd., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. Southern California Edison Company (Formerly Southern California Edison Company Ltd.), Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Southern California Edison Co. v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 6903, 38498, 38499
United States Tax Court
19 T.C. 935; 1953 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 231;
March 4, 1953, Promulgated
Decisions will be entered under Rule 50.
1. In connection with the construction of Boulder Dam petitioner in 1930 contracted to purchase certain minimum specified amounts of electric…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Granite Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- National Grinding Wheel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Alison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Irwin B. Schwabe Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Homer Laughlin China Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.