Legal Opinion

In re Prussian

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 15, 1919No. 3518PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Meyer Prussian, bankrupt. On review of order of referee.

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on a petition to review an order of the referee in bankruptcy for this division, excluding from an examination being held under Bankruptcy Act July 1, 1898, c. 541‘, § 21a, 30 Stat. _551 (Comp. St. § 9605), an attorney who appeared at such examination as counsel for a creditor who had been called by the trustee for examination. The exclusion was based on the ground that such attorney was also counsel for the bankrupt and that therefore his presence would be improper, and on the further ground that as such creditor had not proved his claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Ulmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Good v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  4. In re JehuDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
  5. In re KufflerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baltimore Sun Co. v. Astri Investment Management & Securities Corp. (In Re Astri Investment, Management & Securities Corp.)District Court, D. Maryland · 1988
  2. In Re VanceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API